On branch master
Changes to be committed: modified: Questions_Answers.md
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									315aa55ab7
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						0cd721909b
					
				@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 | 
			
		||||
## Level 1 Questions
 | 
			
		||||
1.   How would you prove the code is correct?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
   	To prove the code is correct I suppose I could set up a test environment
 | 
			
		||||
		where I could account for all connections and run tests like
 | 
			
		||||
		ssh connections, dhclient or dig (dns) connections, nmap port
 | 
			
		||||
@ -7,25 +8,30 @@
 | 
			
		||||
		appear in the program's output.
 | 
			
		||||
   
 | 
			
		||||
2.   How would you make this solution better?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
   	I'd improve the solution by making the functions more focused on
 | 
			
		||||
		specific tasks, improving how I present the interface of each
 | 
			
		||||
		function to each other to more specifically eliminate type
 | 
			
		||||
		or value errors. I'd also allot more time to complete the task
 | 
			
		||||
		since I wasn't able to find enough before the deadline.
 | 
			
		||||
3.   Is it possible for this program to miss a connection?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
   	Yes, if the connection is brief enough so as not to last more than 10
 | 
			
		||||
		seconds and thereby be missed by the most recent read of the
 | 
			
		||||
		/proc/net/tcp file
 | 
			
		||||
4.   If you weren't following these requirements, how would you solve the problem of logging every new connection?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
   	I would likely find a solution that leverages inotify to detect any change to the file and then read it,
 | 
			
		||||
		rather than polling it every 10 seconds.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Level 2 Questions
 | 
			
		||||
1.   Why did you choose 'x' to write the build automation?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
	I would simply choose bash, as it's what I'm most familiar with and it
 | 
			
		||||
		can reliably use the go build tools as well as invoke testing
 | 
			
		||||
		systems like kvm/qemu, docker/podman and the like.
 | 
			
		||||
2.  Is there anything else you would test if you had more time?
 | 
			
		||||
	
 | 
			
		||||
  	If I had more time I'd spend it fleshing out my testing as outlined above
 | 
			
		||||
		and doing a more thorough job of structuring my data in the way
 | 
			
		||||
		that I've modeled it in my head - the choice of go definitely
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user